Thursday, 3 February 2011

More woe at Wednesday

Although Milan Mandaric denies it vehemently, the future of Alan Irvine as Sheffield Wednesday manager always looked suspect as soon as the former Portsmouth and Leicester owner saved the club from a winding-up order at the back end of last year.
Wednesday’s wobble in their quest for promotion aside, it is not unknown for a new owner to come into a club and want to bring in his own man and when your chairman is Milan Mandaric you can never be too confident about the security of your job as a football manager. There is a lengthy list of managers who can testify to that.
And so, after Tuesday’s disappointing 5-3 loss at Peterborough, where the Owls led three times, Alan Irvine became the 12th manager to be sacked by Mandaric and his 13-month stay as Wednesday boss came to an end.
When Wednesday last won in the league in early December, they demolished Bristol Rovers at Hillsborough and Mandaric’s takeover was on the verge of completion. The Owls were sat in second in the table, three points off leaders Brighton and everything looked rosy.
So not even the most pessimistic Sheffield Wednesday fan, of which there are many, would have been expecting for Mandaric to be waiting for his first win as Wednesday owner as we enter February.
Results lately have not been great, but in reality Wednesday have gone only six games without a victory in the league. Four of those have been defeats, albeit three of them at the expense of 14 goals conceded, but in the same amount of time Irvine oversaw a passage to the FA Cup fifth round, including a 3-0 away win at Championship Bristol City.
During Wednesday’s slump they have found other results going against them and they now sit in 12th position, eight points behind sixth-placed MK Dons, who they play on Saturday. They have at least one game in hand over most of the top six.
It has hardly been a cataclysmic run of form that has wiped Wednesday’s season out and Mandaric has spoken of how promotion is still a pertinent aim this season.
There has been no shortage of managerial departures this term and in the modern-day game where managers seem to get the sack if the wind changes, the lengthy reigns of the likes of Sir Alex, Arsene Wenger and Dario Gradi are long gone. But still, it was just six games without a win.
But Mandaric  is a man who demands instant success and he insists that the change had to be made in order for that promotion to be achieved. It is his money that saved Wednesday back in November and he has a right to appoint his own man, though the timing of it raises questions.

Irvine was backed heavily in January transfer window as he brought in Reda Johnson, Mark Morrison, Mark Reynolds and Gary Madine.
For Irvine then not to be allowed to make the most of that backing by being given time to bed his new players in,  raises the question of whether the players were brought in above his head, with Mandaric planning a managerial change long before it happened.
It’s worth pointing out at this stage Mandaric insists the decision to sack Irvine was made after Tuesday’s loss at Peterborough and it was not long ago that he gave his full backing to the former Preston manager.
So, attention turns to who will take Irvine’s place. Gary Megson has been named on the shortlist with Gary Johnson also believed to be in the frame.
With a full pay-out from Bolton, a house just down the road and a huge piece of his heart belonging to the Owls, Megson would jump at the chance to get off the golf course and get back into action.
Candidates who are currently in work have also not been ruled out, drawing attention to John Sheridan at Chesterfield. You’d suspect that Dave Allen would rather die than allow Sheridan to move, but it would be something that the former Wednesday legend (that’s Sheridan and not Allen!) would be keen to happen.
The club have hinted at a quick appointment, possibly in time for the MK Dons clash, but whoever gets the role will know they will need instant success or they may well become victim number 13.

1 comment:

  1. 4MinsOfTimeAddedOn3 February 2011 at 23:05

    To be honest its not hasty at all and your quest for "an angle" is misplaced.

    Alan Irvine was tasked with keeping us in the Championship. He failed to this. I for one was prepared to take ugly football at the tail end of last season. The squad we had wasn't going to pass anyone off the park in the Championship. If ugly wins was what it took to save us from the dire mess Brian Laws left us in so be it. Alan Irvine failed in his mandate last season. No problem for me he inherited a poor squad.

    I expected League 1 to be a little different. Last season's squad would have looked a lot stronger in this league as compared to the Championship and everyone was starting the season on zero points after all. I was looking forward to attractive attacking football. This was reinforced when Irvine had the pitch widened over the summer, and bought in a number of wingers/wide midfielders amonst his summer signings, woefully neglecting the problem area of our central midfield until a week ago. We also started the season with Neil Mellor, Clinton Morrison, Paul Heffernan and Marcus Tudgay up front. None of these strikers are more than 6 foot tall and none of them have made a name for themselves for being great in the air. I was literally astounded when the season began and Darren Purse was still hoofing the ball aimlessly in the vague direction of the opposition's penalty area.

    You're right to say no-one was moaning (loudly - although a quick trip around internet forums including this one would have shown differently) when we second in the league, but then is football fan's being fickle really news to you? When we are on a losing run, it wasn't just the losing run to be taken into account. It was the complete and utter lack of a plan B. It was a complete refusal to play certain players, including one he bought in the summer, Paul Heffernan. Mostly for me though it was the total lack of a cohesive strategy in Alan Irvine's tactics and decisions. I would dearly love to ask Mr Irvine to explain to me why you widen the pitch and sign wingers - both stretching the midfield - and then play long ball to 5ft 10 inch strikers. As far as I can see the net result was that a lot of long balls bounced back off a lot of grateful centrral defenders, into our poor central midfield who consistently failed to win the second ball. This left the opposition midfield with bags of room to play through our stretched midlfield and generally cause us untold havoc week in week out.

    If I did get to ask him I know what the answer would be. That I don't have my coaching badges. I wonder why the fans turned on Alan Irvine? I might not have my coaching badges but I do have two working eyes and an ability to state what is plain to see. The sacking of Irvine was not hasty. Had I been in charge and known in the summer that he intended to play long ball this season, in view of his other decisions, he would have been gone before August.

    ReplyDelete